Showing posts with label Sugar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sugar. Show all posts

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Human Study: Sucralose does NOT promote Weight Gain- What do you believe?

I thought this would be an interesting article for you all to read! What are your thoughts? I've come to realize that "Sweeteners" are a very personal, political and sensitive topic!

Sucralose does not promote weight gain: Human study


By Stephen Daniells, 07-May-2010



Related topics: Science & Nutrition, Sweeteners (intense, bulk, polyols)


Consumption of sucralose and sucralose-sweetened products does not affect gut hormones linked to hunger, or detrimentally affect blood sugar levels, says a new study from Australia.

Results from animal studies that indicated sucralose could modify the absorption of glucose in the intestine were not observed when the sweetener was fed to humans, according to findings published in the British Journal of Nutrition.


Researchers from the University of Adelaide and the Royal Adelaide Hospital also report that consumption of the sweetener did not affect levels of a hormone linked to hunger - glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1).


“Species differences are likely to account for the lack of effect of sucralose in human subjects,” wrote the researchers, led by Christopher Rayner.


“It has been reported that there is much lower duodenal expression of [the glucose transporter] GLUT2 in human subjects than in rats and mice, while expression of [sodium-dependent glucose transporter] SGLT1 is much greater in human subjects,” they added.


The controversy

Previous studies with animals have suggested that sweeteners may interact with glucose and enhance the absorption of glucose in the gut via GLUT2 expression.


Indeed, scientists from the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIH) recently reported that a synergistic effect between sucralose and glucose may trigger the release of the appetite-suppressing hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and therefore promote a feeling of fullness (Diabetes Care, 2010, Vol. 32, pp. 2184-2186).

“This raises the question as to whether the combination of an artificial sweetener with a carbohydrate could have a synergistic effect on glucose absorption in human subjects,” explained Rayner and his co-workers.

“The notion that consuming artificial sweeteners together with carbohydrates could enhance glucose absorption and therefore elevate postprandial blood glucose concentrations is of fundamental clinical importance,” they added.

The human test

In order to study such links in humans, the Adelaide-based researchers recruited ten health subjects with an average age of 27 and an average BMI of 23.4 kg/m2 and randomly assigned them to receive either sucralose (provided by Tate & Lyle) or a saline solution in combination with a solution containing both glucose and “its non-metabolised analogue, 3-O-methylglucose (3-OMG)” via a catheter directly into the intestine.

APPLICATION NOTE

Nutrition Age Ingredients

Following the new nutritional and health global trends, La Morella Nuts suggests four actions to be in the pole position in the New Nutrition Age. According to these actions several new product developments and innovations are presented... Click here

Results showed no differences in levels of blood glucose, GLP-1, or 3-OMG between the sucralose and control groups.

“Sucralose does not appear to modify the rate of glucose absorption or the glycaemic or incretin response to intraduodenal glucose infusion when given acutely in healthy human subjects,” concluded the researchers.


Supporting science
The findings are inline with a review by NIH scientists, which failed to find a link between intakes of artificial sweeteners and metabolic changes in children (International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, doi: 10.3109/17477160903497027).

The overall safety of sucralose was re-assessed and supported by an expert panel, made up of scientists from Rutgers University, New York Medical College, Harvard School of Public Health, Columbia University, and Duke University.

Writing in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (2009, Vol. 55, pp. 6-12) the panel concluded: “The extensive safety data of sucralose and maltodextrin have been rigorously evaluated by experts around the world, and the available evidence demonstrates that Splenda, sucralose, and maltodextrin are safe for their intended uses.”


Sucralose is reportedly used as an ingredient in over 4,000 products worldwide, according to Tate & Lyle.

Source: British Journal of Nutrition

Published online ahead of print, doi:10.1017/S0007114510001327

"Effect of the artificial sweetener, sucralose, on small intestinal glucose absorption in healthy human subjects"

Authors: J. Ma, J. Chang, H.L. Checklin, R.L. Young, K.L. Jones, M. Horowitz, C.K. Rayner

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Fructose Linked to Spread of Cancer

This was sent to me and I thought I'd pass it along. I have written numerous articles about the dangers of sugar/fructose, so I thought this might be beneficial to read!

Beware: Fructose Linked to the Spread of Cancer

As you'll know, we've been bringing you regular updates on the numerous health risks associated with fructose. Now, a Dr. Anthony Heaney of the University of California in Los Angeles (UCLA) must be aware that the US government has generously contributed to the HFCS boom by imposing high tariffs to discourage sugar imports, while subsidizing farms that produce the raw material for HFCS: corn.

In any case, Dr. Heaney just wants to help cancer patients live longer.

Can't argue with that.

Cancer 101
When Dr. Heaney and his UCLA team recently exposed pancreatic cancer cells to fructose, they found that fructose prompted a dramatic growth of the malignant cells.

In the journal Cancer Research, they wrote, "These findings show that cancer cells can readily metabolize fructose to increase proliferation." And even worse, they believe that fructose may have this effect on other types of cancer cells — not just pancreatic cancer.

Of course, the Corn Refiners Association immediately responded with a press release, calling the conclusions of the UCLA study "premature."

Fair enough. After all, it was a lab study, and what happens in a Petri dish can be very different from what happens in the body.

Still, I'd be willing to bet a pay cheque that further research will very likely show that fructose does play some sort of role in cancer cell proliferation. For two reasons:

1) HFCS intake has already been linked with increased pancreatic cancer risk, and

2) It's all about sugar, which is 50 per cent fructose and 50 per cent glucose. Sugar has been directly linked to cancer.

Potent fuel for cancer growth

About 80 years ago, Dr. German Otto Warburg, showed that glucose is a potent fuel for cancer cell growth. And this wasn't some harebrained theory. It was proof. And it won Dr. Warburg a Nobel Prize.

For decades, the medical community has been aware of the danger for cancer patients who eat foods with added sugars and refined simple carbohydrates. So for every cancer patient, this advice should be considered Cancer 101: Wean yourself from these foods, and then restrict consumption as much as possible.

As for high fructose corn syrup, if you have cancer, you can't go wrong to avoid it completely. And if you don't have cancer...well, you can't go wrong to avoid it completely!

Sources:
"Fructose Induces Transketolase Flux to Promote Pancreatic Cancer Growth" Cancer Research, Vol. 70, No. 15, 8/1/10, cancerres.aacrjournals.org
"Cancer cells slurp up fructose, US study finds" Reuters, 8/2/10, reuters.com


On a somewhat related topic, AMAZON has some of their SUGAR FREE syrups and products on sale!
Check it out and hit up MY STORE. Categories are on the right hand side!

Friday, September 10, 2010

Sugar By Any Other Name.......

I am going to be giving a "Healthy Eating/ Healthy Living" Seminar at a prestigious high-end gym to some of the members. As such, I am keeping it pretty basic. Anyone who reads my blog knows that I am seriously opposed to added sugars; from cancer, impaired immune health, degenerative diseases, inflammation, diabetes, obesity, poor brain function, accelerated aging, wrinkles (Glycation) to lung, joint and more serious mental disorders (schizophrenia, depression etc), refined, added sugar is a detriment to every facet of our health.
I will be doing a series specifically on the Dangers Of Sugar. For today, I thought I would leave some food for thought, by way of the MANY different hidden names of sugar. The agricultural industry is constantly coming up with new names to disguise sugar.

Amasake


Apple sugar

Barbados sugar

Bark sugar

Barley malt

Barley malt syrup

Beet sugar

Brown rice syrup

Brown sugar

Cane juice

Cane sugar

Caramelized foods

Carbitol

Carmel coloring

Carmel sugars

Concentrated fruit juice

Corn sweetener

Corn syrup or evaporated solids

Date sugar

Dextrin

Dextrose

Diglycerides

Disaccharides

D-tagalose

Evaporated cane juice

Evaporated cane juice solids

Florida crystals

Fructooligosaccharides (FOS)

Fructose

Fruit juice concentrate

Galactose Glucitol

Glucoamine

Gluconolactone

Glucose

Glucose polymers

Glucose syrup

Glycerides

Glycerine

Glycerol

Glycol

Hexitol

High-fructose corn syrup

Honey

Inversol

Invert sugar

Isomalt

Karo syrups

Lactose

Levulose

"Light" sugar

"Lite" sugar

Malitol

Malt dextrin

Malted barley

Maltodextrins

Maltodextrose

Maltose

Malts

Mannitol

Mannose

Maple syrup Microcrystalline cellulose

Molasses

Monoglycerides

Monosaccarides

Nectars

Neotame

Pentose

Polydextrose

Polyglycerides

Powdered sugar

Raisin juice

Raisin syrup

Raw sugar

Ribose rice syrup

Rice malt

Rice sugar

Rice sweeteners

Rice syrup solids

Saccharides

Sorbitol

Sorghum

Sucanat

Sucanet

Sucrose

Sugar cane

Trisaccharides

Turbinado sugar

Unrefined sugar

White sugar

Xylitol

Zylose